Category Archives: Perspective

Merit or Brahmin Privilege: How a Corrupt Lawyer Become Chief Justice of India ?

By Nilim Dutta

(This article is taken from public domain and copyright by author)

Pandit Godabarish Mishra was a Brahmin who was born on 26 October 1886 in what is now the present district of Khordha in Odisha. He completed his primary education from the village school and then received his higher education from the Puri District School in 1906 and enrolled in Ravenshaw College. He received his B.A. in Philosophy in 1910. He obtained his M.A. in economics in Calcutta in 1912.

Please note that he had obtained a Masters in Economics in 1912 while children of most Dalit-Bahujan-Adivasi are still struggling for access to primary education more than a hundred years later. At the time he had obtained a University Degree, Dalits children were not even allowed to enroll in schools.

A question had arisen in my mind to which I have not found an answer yet. 20 years before Pandit Godabarish Mishra was born, that is in 1866, Odisha suffered one of the worst famines in India’s history. One third of Odisha’s population had reportedly perished in this famine through starvation deaths. I wonder how Pandit Mishra’s family had survived through this devastating famine.

“Pandit” Mishra went on to participate in the non-cooperation movement, rose through the ranks in Congress, got elected to the state legislature in the very first Legislative Assembly Elections held in Odisha in 1937 from the Banpur Legislative Assembly Constituency. In 1941, he became the Finance & Education Minister in Odisha and held the portfolio till 1944.

It was when Pandit Godabarish Mishra was holding the all important portfolios of Finance & Education as a Cabinet Minister, two very important institutions were established.

Pandit Godabarish Mishra, introduced the Utkal University Bill, which was passed by the Odisha Legislative Assembly on 30th June 1943. On receiving the Governor’s assent on 2nd August 1943, the Utkal University Act, 1943 came into force, clearing the way for the foundation of Utkal University on 27th November 1943. The University started functioning from this date in room no. 15 of Ravenshaw College, Cuttack. It was the first University of Odisha.

Ravenshaw College was Pandit Godavarish Mishra’s alma mater from where he had received his B.A. in Philosophy.

The other important institution, the foundation for establishment of which was laid during his tenure as a cabinet minister, was the High Court of Odisha at Cuttack.

Pandit Godabarish Mishra remained a member of the legislative assembly of Odisha from the Banpur Constituency from 1937 – 1945 and again from 1952 till his death on 26 July 1956 at the age of 70.

It is thus clear that Pandit Godabarish Mishra left behind considerable social and political capital to his next generation in inheritance, besides material wealth.

What did the next generation of Mishra’s family do?

Pandit Godabarish Mishra was survived by his three sons (I don’t know whether he had any daughters).

Raghunath Misra (Born – 30 June 1916. Died – 20 March 1990)
Loknath Misra (Born – 21 Nov 1922. Died – 27 May 2009)
Ranganath Misra (Born – 25 Nov 1926. Died – 13 Sept 2012)

Raghunath Misra (1916 – 1990)

Record of Odisha Legislative Assembly reveals that Raghunath Misra was a “matriculate”. I am unaware of what other “merits” he had, but he inherited his father’s Constituency, Banpur, and was elected twice consecutively to the Legislative Assembly of Odisha, 1961-1967, 1967-1971 as a MLA of the Congress Party.

He also, reportedly, “took keen interest for the upliftment of Adibasis and Harijans in the constituency,” whatever that means. Considering the state of Adivasis and Dalits at present, I can only imagine how much upliftment actually happened.

Raghunath Misra had one accomplishment, however. He fathered a son, Dipak Misra, who would became a lawyers in due course of time.

While Raghunath Misra was a MLA, his younger brother, Loknath Misra, was elected to the Rajya Sabha as a MP, and his youngest brother, Ranganath Misra was elevated to the bench of the Odisha High Court as a permanent judge.

Loknath Misra (1922 – 2009)

Godabarish Mishra’s second son, Loknath Misra, was more illustrious. Again, I don’t know what “merit” he had, but records show that he was a Member of Parliament in the Rajya Sabha, representing Odisha, for three consecutive terms from 1960-1978. He was a member of the Swatantra Party.

When Loknath Misra’s elder brother Raghunath Misra was a MLA in Odisha, and he himself was a MP in the Rajya Sabha, and when a Swatantra Party Government was in power in Odisha, their younger brother, Ranganath Misra, was elevated to the bench of the Odisha High Court as a permanent judge in 1969.

Loknath Misra was made Governor of Assam on 17 March 1991 by the Chandra Shekhar Government at the Center. He continued to hold the post till 1 September 1997 throughout the tenure of P.V. Narasimha Rao led Congress Government at the Center, and for a brief period from 1992 – 1993, held the charge of the Governor of Nagaland too.

At the time Loknath Misra was appointed the Governor of Assam, his younger brother, Ranganath Misra, was already the 21st Chief Justice of India.

Loknath Misra’s son, Pinaki Misra, continues in his father’s footsteps and had been elected a Member of Parliament to the 11th, 15th, and 16th Lok Sabha and is a sitting MP from Odisha’s Puri Lok Sabha Constituency.

Ranganath Misra (1926 – 2012)

Godabarish Misra’s youngest son, Ranganath Misra, became a lawyer and joined the Bar at Cuttack on 18 September 1950. He was elevated to the bench of the Odisha High Court as a permanent judge on 4 July 1969. At the time, his eldest brother, Raghunath Misra was a sitting Congress MLA of the Odisha Legislative Assembly and his other elder brother, Loknath Misra, was a sitting MP of the Rajya Sabha from Odisha.

It may just be coincidental but when Ranganath Misra was elevated to the bench and made a judge, the Chief Justice of Odisha High Court was another Brahmin, Justice Gati Krushna Misra and the Prime Minister of India too was a Brahmin, Indira Gandhi.

Ranganath Misra became the Acting Chief Justice of Odisha High Court on 6 Nov 1980, and held the charge till 16 January 1981 when his appointment as the Chief Justice of Odisha High Court was confirmed.

Ranganath Misra was appointed a judge of the Supreme Court of India on 15 March 1983.

In the aftermath of the anti-Sikh pogrom in 1984 following assassination of Indira Gandhi, the then Prime Minister, Rajiv Gandhi appointed a one man Commission to be headed by Ranganath Misra in MAy 1985 to investigate horrific massacre. The Commission submitted its report in August 1986, which was then made public in February 1987.

The Ranganath Misra Commission on Anti-Sikh Pogrom completely whitewashed the involvement of Congress leaders in the pogrom as also the complicity of police and officials.

It recommended no criminal prosecution of any individual, and it cleared all high-level officials of directing the pogroms. In its findings, the commission did acknowledge that many of the victims testifying before it had received threats from local police. While the commission noted that there had been “widespread lapses” on the part of the police, it concluded that “the allegations before the commission about the conduct of the police are more of indifference and negligence during the riots than of any wrongful overt act.

Ranganath Misra went on to become the 21st Chief Justice of India on 25 September 1990 and held office till 24 November 1991.

It was while he was the Chief Justice of India, his elder brother, Loknath Misra was appointed the Governor of Assam, on 17 march 1991.

After his retirement, in something which appears to me to be black humour, Ranganath Misra became the first Chairman of the National Human Rights Commission in 1993. In 1998, he was elected to the Rajya Sabha as a Congress MP from Odisha.

In 2007, Ranganath Misra was appointed to head the National Commission for Religious and Linguistic Minorities.

Dipak Misra (1953 – present)

When his nephew, Dipak Misra, son of his eldest brother Raghunath Misra, joined the Bar and started practising in the Odisha High Court, Ranganath Misra was a sitting judge of the High Court.

When Ranga­nath Misra was elevated to the Orissa HC, his chamber passed on to R.C. Patnaik (who also went on to become an SC judge). From Patnaik, the chamber (and clients) passed to Ranganath’s older son, Devanand Misra, till his premature death, when Dipak Misra took over.

It was in 1979, when Dipak Misra was a lawyer practising in the Odisha High Court where his youngest paternal uncle, Ranganath Misra was a sitting judge, the grandson of Godabarish Mishra, former Finance & Education Minister of Odisha, son of former MLA of Banpur Raghunath Misra, nephew of former Rajya Sabha MP Loknath Misra, and nephew of sitting judge of the Odish High Court Ranganath Misra, he had applied for and obtained a lease of two acres of agricultural land from the government of Odisha.

In the affidavit filed by him (as a condition for allotment) he said: “I am Brahmin by caste and the extent of landed property held by me including all the members of my family is nil.”

In a CBI inquiry in 2012 directed by the Odisha High Court, as response to a Writ Petition before it, the CBI found that:

“In this case, Shri Dipak Mishra, S/o Raghunath Mishra, Vill-Tulsipur, PS- Lalbagh, Cuttack & permanent R/o Banpur, Puri was sanctioned 2 acres of land by the then Tahasildar Mr. J. A. Khan on 30.11.1979 at Plot No 34, Khata No 330, Mouja- Bidhyasharpur.

The allotment order of Tahasildar was cancelled by ADM Cuttack vide Order 11.02.1985. But the record was corrected only on 06.01.12 as per the order passed by the Tahasildar, Cuttack only after 06.01.2012.

Enquiry has already revealed certain instances of irregular leasing out of government land to ineligible beneficiaries by the Tahasildar, Cuttack Sadar during the period 1977 to 1980 in Bidyadharpur Mouza. Though some of the cases of irregular lease were cancelled by the ADM (Revenue) on review but the leaseholders had not vacated the said land. Even the records were corrected after 06.01.2012 even though the lease was cancelled during 1984-85.”

What Dipak Misra had shown as early as 1979 wasn’t “Brahmin Merit”. It was nothing short of “Brahmin Genius”.

For such merit, Dipak Misra was elevated to the bench of the Odisha High Court and appointed as an Additional Judge on 17 January 1996. He sought transfer and moved to the Madhya Pradesh High Court on 3 March, 1997. He became a Permanent Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court on 19 December, 1997.

It would be important to note that when he was elevated to the bench of the Odisha High Court, his older uncle Loknath Misra was the Governor of Assam, and his younger uncle, Ranganath Misra was the Chairperson, National Human Rights Commission, after having retired as the 21st Chief Justice of India.

When Ranganath Misra was elevated to the bench of the Odisha High Court in 1969, his chamber passed on to R.C. Patnaik. When Dipak Misra joined the Bar, he started in his uncle’s old chamber under R.C. Patnaik. When R.C. Patnaik was himself elevated to the bench of the Odisha High Court in 19 Sept 1981, it was passed on to Ranganath;s older son Devanand Misra, who tragically died prematurely. Thus, by 1981, two persons who had close relations with Dipak Misra, were on the bench of the Odisha High Court – his uncle Ranganath Misra, was the CHief Justice, and R.C. Patnaik, his senior, was a judge.

When Ranganath Misra was serving as the Chief Justice of India, he opened up the way for R.C. Patnaik to be elevated to the Supreme Court as a judge. R.C. Patnaik was to serve till 27 July 2000 but died prematurely barely a few months after his elevation to the Supreme Court on 30 May 1992.

It would be a little preposterous to believe that him being the nephew of a former CJ, Odisha High Court, and the CJI, and in whose chamber he had practised law, had no role to play in his elevation to the bench of the Odisha High Court as an Additional Judge in 1996.

It was while serving as a judge in the Madhya Pradesh High Court, from 3 March 1997 till December 2009, another meritorious Brahmin judge, Arun Mishra (son of a former Madhya Pradesh High Court Judge) joined the bench, on 25 October 1999.

Dipak Misra went on to become Chief Justice, Patna High Court on 23rd December, 2009, and then become the Chief Justice of Delhi High Court on 24th May, 2010.

It is believed that former Chief Justice of India, H.S. Kapadia had an instrumental role in first transfering Dipak Misra to Delhi High Court as Chief Justice, and thereafter elevating him as a Judge of the Supreme Court on 10 Oct 2011.

Even while he was a judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Dipak Misra showed extraordinary “merit” by admitting a Writ Petition by one Shyam Narayan Chouksey, who stated that he was extremely hurt that people in the cinema theater did not stand up when the National Anthem was shown being sung by a child actor in the Bollywood Movie, Kabhi Khushi Kabhi Gham.

Going further, Dipak Misra, ruled in this case on 24 July 2003, that singing of the National Anthem should be deleted from the film because it was not properly picturised and that its exhibition in cinema theater or broadcast over TV/Cable without the scene deleted can amount to an insult to the National Anthem as there is no way to ensure that people would stand up when the same is being sung in the film.

Isn’t that just brilliant?

By another Brahminical Miracle, the same petitioner, Shyam Narayan Chouksey, came back after 13 years to the Supreme Court of India in 2016, with another Writ Petition, this time, seeking playing of the National Anthem be made mandatory in all cinemas and that all should stand up while it is being played. By yet another Brahminical Miracle, in violation of Supreme Court Registry norms, the matter got listed before a bench headed by Dipak Misra even though he should not have heard it because he had passed a judgment on the same matter n a petition filed by the same petitioner 13 years ago in Madhya Pradesh High Court.

This was even before his name got mired in many more questions of “merit”.

In the suicide note left behind by Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Kalikho Pul on 13 July 2016, he has clearly alleged that Aditya Misra, brother of Dipak Misra, had asked for Rs. 37 crores from him through intermediaries to get him a favourable judgment in the case for restoring his government to power, although allegations weren’t against Dipak Misra alone.

In spite of such conduct, Dipak Misra became the Chief Justice of India on 28 August 2017. Even before he could complete 5 months in office, matters went down hill so fast that the four senior-most judges of the country, his fellow judges in the 5 judge Supreme Court Collegium, yesterday called for an unprecedented press conference and let it be known to the whole country that they have had enough. India’s judiciary is one of the most conservative of institutions and when four of its senior-most judges revolted against the CJI, one can easily guess that they cannot take the diktats of a landless meritorious Brahmin anymore.

In question are extremely sensitive cases being somehow allowed to be heard by a bench headed only by another meritorious Brahmin judge, his fellow judge from Madhya Pradesh High Court who got elevated to the Supreme Court in 2014, Arun Mishra, who is 10th in seniority among the 25 Supreme Court judges.

Interestingly, Arun Mishra was among the first three judges, and senior-most among the three, who were appointed to the Supreme Court by the Modi Government on 7 July 2014. Of course it is the Supreme Court collegium who selects and makes the recommendation and in his instance, this collegium was headed by either CJI Sathasivam or his successor, CJI Lodha.

In question are these cases:

  1. Sahara Birla Diaries
    2. CJAR and Kamini Jaiswal petitions in Medical College bribery scam
    3. PIL on death of Judge B.H. Loya.

All the three cases are politically extremely sensitive with needle of suspicion pointing towards either Modi, Amit Shah, or the CJI. Why have all the cases have ended up before Arun Mishra?
Because of Brahmin Merit.

Dipak Misra is the living example of how a landless Brahmin Advocate can become the Chief Justice of India through sheer hard work and merit. He is the living proof that Brahmin merit beats everything – caste privilege, nepotism, favouritism, skullduggery, and outright lies and fraud – to succeed.

Note: It just took me an afternoon, out of curiosity, about the merit of the present Chief Justice of India that I discovered what I have written. Every statement about his family that I have made above is FACT, and verifiable. Even if I am haulde up for contempt, I would not change a word of what I have written here. Read and think how Brahmins continue to have a stranglehold on privilege, wealth, and power, through a stranglehold on the legislature, judiciary, bureaucracy, and the academia.

Dipak Misra is a living example of the rot that caste had perpetuated in this country. He began his life going to a school named after his grandfather while children of Dalits have to struggle to not get sucked into what their previous generations were doing, while children of Adivasis have to struggle not to die of malnutrition.




Supreme Court or Supreme Corrupt ?

They say India has Independent judiciary that doesn’t succumb to any pressure or bias. They function strictly as per rule and conventions. The judges like angels descended on earth to deliver justice impartially. ROFL,  just kidding!

Indian Supreme court and the court system under it are anti-Dalits and corrupt to the core. The judges have Constitution of India in their hand but Manusmriti in their heart. The court system is manned by Manuwadis, who are overwhelmingly Brahmins. These judges and lawyers are such cunning and shameless that even Devil will be ashamed of himself.

At present Indian Prisons are full with Dalits. Every fourth prisoner in India  is a Dalit. They account 22% of total prisoners while their population is only 15%. Dalits constitute largest group in prison, who are followed by Muslims at 20% and tribal 17%, totaling more than half of the prisoners rotting in Indian prison.

The Dalits are not a violent group. Centuries of physical and mental oppression have made them timid. One Brahmin boy can terrorize five Dalits boys. They don’t have a criminal mindset, generally speaking. But they are majority in Indian prisons. Manuwadis court system hate them.

The Manuwadis always quote of the POTA (Prevention of Atrocities Act) and assert to outside world that India follows a positive discrimination policy that constitutionally protect the vulnerable Dalits and Tribals. But nothing is far from truth. The POTA is toothless act. No so-called upper caste criminal eery languishing in any Indian prison convicted under this act. Even so-called high casted criminals booked under the act are ultimately let go by Manuwadi judicial system.

At present there is no Dalit judge in Supreme Court. The Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, a Brahmin corrupt crook. He was involved in illegal land acquisition in Orissa, medical scam in UP, and his also name figures in Khalko Pui’s suicide case. Dipak Mishra is an RSS agent who openly voices against reservation. The previous two CJI were very corrupt people. Jagadish Kehar’s name to figured in Khalko Pui’s suicide case. Justice Markenday Katju has exposed the corruption of then CJI H.L.Dattu who has many illegally acquired prime properties in prime locations.

Last year the corrupt supreme court dismissed case of Gujrat High Court judges taking plots from Gujarat Government to deliver favorable judgments. The condition of pathetic judicial system in India is such that the corrupt crook Dipak Misra became judge in the Lucknow Medical scam case where he is one of the accused.

A Dalit High Court Judge named K Kannan last year tried to expose Indian corrupt judiciary. Apparently he had a list of corrupt Supreme Court Judges with evidence. This miffed the Supreme Corrupt (Supreme Court)  and they got Kanna arrested by labeling him mentally unsound. Now Justice Kannan is rotting in the prison.

Down Indian Manuwadi Judicial System. Down Supreme Corrupt.

Durga Puja or Slut Puja?

Durga Puja or Dussehara is a grand festival celebrated in India with much fan fare by Manuwadi. Like other Hindu mythologies having contradictory narratives, Durga Puja too have many narratives behind it. The predominant and widely accepted narrative is that Durga (symbol of good) defeated Mahisasur (symbol of evil).  Before we delve deep into the claim of narrative let’s discuss the genesis of Durga Puja.

Brief History

The first mention of the word ‘Durga’ is found in Markandey Purana, a scripture written in 250-500 AD. However the celebration of the festival is fairly recent, dating some 250-300 years back. Bizarre may it sound it was Raja Narbakrishnadev of Calcutta organized the first Durga Puja to honour  Lord Clive, under whom British own the Battle of Plassey in 1757 defeating combined forces of three kings that include Nawab of Bengal. From then the celebration gained traction, and spread to the other areas. Now you can understand why Durga Puja is wildly popular in West Bengal than in any other states.

It is very important to note that around the same time as Durga Puja, many tribal people in Bihar, Jharkhand and Bengal observe Mahisasur Shradh Divas, a day of mourning for their great indigenous king Mahisasur, who was killed deceptively.  Ever since Durga Puja started, the Mahisasur Shradh Divas has been overshadowed and its celebration has been made a criminal offense.

The True Narrative

The indigenous narrative of Tribals/locals, which in the absence of a written form, has been passed in oral form generation after generation. Only recently attempts are being made to compile them in written form. The narrative is far superior than the Brahminical version. Not just Durga puja, the Brahmins have made up many false and imaginative stories to mislead people maintain their status quo and perpetuate their hegemony.

The tribal version of Durga Puja is far superior than Brahminical version in that it speaks only facts. First, the tribal version accepts that their king Mahisasur (Buffalo God) has in fact been killed. It does not try to convert a defeat into a win. Second, it tallies with Brahmincial version that Mahisasur was killed in the ninth day.  Third, it agrees with the fact that the indigenous (tribal/Dravidian) were subsequently defeated by the outsiders in the war.

So where tribal version is differs from Brahminical version?

The war between Durga and Mahisasur was not a war between good and evil. In fact it was a war between Non-Aryans versus Aryans, between foreigners and indigenous people. Mahisasur was an extremely powerful tribal king in the Bong region. He was well known for his brute force like Samson.  The cunning and war mongering Aryans failed to defeat Mahisasur. They hatched a plan and sent an extremely beautiful yet shrewd prostitute named Durga. Mahisasur was blown away by her beauty and charm. Mahisasur made the mistake there. He married her, who killed him in the ninth day of their honeymoon when he was asleep tired after sex.  The death of Mahisasur sent shock wave in his kingdom and a brutal slaughter of non-Aryans by Aryans followed. The sheer scale and brutality of slaughter was such that they Aryans made garland with heads of defeated people’s head and draped it around Durga’s neck.

You will be surprised to learn that high caste prostitutes in Bengal identify Durga as their main clan member, and they take pride of it. Many places in Bengal where Durga Puja is celebrated since long have the custom to collect mud from local prostitutes’ house and build Durga’s statue with it.

The bottom line is that the defeat of Mahisasur was not straight forward, but through deception and cunningness. Durga was actually not a God. She was a prostitute, who gained status of God after treacherously killing her husband Mahisasur. There are overwhelming evidence to it, but the cunning Manuwadi  hid the inconvenient truth.

Financial Scandals of Brahmins and Banias in Independent India

Overwhelming majority of the scandals in independent India are committed by  people belonging Brahmins and Banias. They have looted the country and its resources like land and minerals.  They have defamed only so-called lower caste leaders such as Lalu Prasad Yadav and Mayawati. With the help of Media which they control and Govt. they sponsor, these Brahmin and Bania leaders from Brahminical parties have able to label only so-called lower castes leaders as corrupt and themselves as honest.

The first scandal in independent India was committed by a Brahmin named V.K.Krishna Menon in 1948 when he bypassed protocol and signed a deal worth 80 lakhs with a foreign company to purchase 400 Army Jeeps. The trend has continued. The Brahmins, Banias and few from upper castes have defrauded of country and looted it at the expense of Dalits and Tribal.

Today, India ranks first in social inequality and 2nd in economic inequality in the world.Let’s have a look at big financial scandals and which caste groups were involved in those.

Scandals by Brahmins

  • Basil International = $530 million (Brahmin)
  • Sahara scandal = $9 billion (Brahmin)
  • Sharada scandal = $6 billion (Brahmin)
  • Common Wealth Games = $12 billion (Brahmin)
  • DDCA = $14 million (Brahmin)
  • Pixion Media = $100 million (Brahmin)
  • Surya Pharma = $100 million (Brahmin)
  • Electrotherm India Limited = $332 million (Brahmin)
  • Vijay Mallya = $1.3 billion (Brahmin)
  • Winsome Diamond = $400 million (Brahmin)
  • Surya Vinayak Industries = $210 million (Brahmin)
  • Coal scandal = $40 billion (Brahmin)
  • Jayalalithaa = $6 billion (Brahmin)
  • IGI Airport = $32 billion (Brahmin)
  • DIAL Scam = $25 billion (Brahmin)
  • Granite scandal = $2.8 billion (Brahmin)
  • Maharashtra Irrigation scandal = $12 billion (Brahmin)
  • Karnataka Wakf Board Land scandal = $39 billion (Brahmin)
  • Central Excise Duty fraud = $3.82 billion (Brahmin)
  • Highway scandal = $13.97 million (Brahmin)
  • Gift scandal = $100,000 (Brahmin)
  • Flying Club fraud = $38 million (Brahmin)
  • Arvind Joshi and Tinu Joshi = $50 million (Brahmin)
  • Obsolete French Fighter Jets = $11 billion (Brahmin)
  • Goa mining scandal = $700 million (Brahmin)
  • Kashyap EPFO scandal = $118 million (Brahmin)
  • ISRO-Devas = $300 million (Brahmin)
  • Cash-for-votes = $715,000 (Brahmin)
  • 2G spectrum = $6.9 billion (Brahmin)
  • Commonwealth Games = $15.5 billion (Brahmin)
  • LIC Housing Loan scandal = $200 million (Brahmin)
  • Belekeri port = $12 billion (Brahmin)
  • UIDAI = $1 billion (Brahmin)
  • Scorpene Deal = $10 million (Brahmin)
  • Barak Missile = $200 million (Brahmin)
  • Cobbler scandal = $214 million (Brahmin)
  • Sukh Ram = $5 million (Brahmin)
  • SNC Lavalin = $10 million (Brahmin)
  • Bhansali = $200 million (Brahmin)
  • Pickle bribes = $20,000 (Brahmin)
  • Indian Bank = $260 million (Brahmin)
  • Bofors = $400 million (Brahmin)
  • HDW commissions = $4 million (Brahmin)
  • Haridas Mundhra = $10 million (Brahmin)
  • Teja loans = $5 million (Brahmin)
  • BHU = $100,000 (Brahmin)
  • Jeep scandal = $160,000 (Brahmin)

Scandals by Banias

  • Murli Industries = $135 million (Bania)
  • Kemrock Industries = $140 million (Bania)
  • Varun Industries = $183 million (Bania)
  • Zoom Developers = $275 million (Bania)
  • Forever Precious Jewellery = $200 million (Bania)
  • Corporate Ispat Alloys = $205 million (Bania)
  • Vodafone Scandal = $1.9 billion (Bania)
  • Kinetic Finance scandal = $34 million (Bania)
  • Ultra Mega Power Projects scandal = $5 million (Bania)
  • Gujarat PSU = $3.39 billion (Bania)
  • Pulse scandal = $200,000 (Bania)
  • IPL Cricket = $8 billion (Bania)
  • Ketan Parekh = $200 million (Bania)
  • Calcutta Stock Exchange = $2 million (Bania)
  • Harshad Mehta = $800 million (Bania)
  • Nagarwala = $1 million (Bania)
  • Kuo oil scandal = $440,000 (Bania)

Some other scandals by so-called upper castes

  • Deccan Chronicle = $100 million (Upper caste)
  • Orchid Chemicals = $150 million (Upper caste)
  • Jaganmohan Reddy = $15 billion (Upper caste)
  • Andhra Pradesh land scandal = $20 billion (Upper caste)
  • Maharashtra stamp duty scandal = $126 million (Upper caste)
  • Punjab paddy scandal = $3.59 million (Upper caste)
  • Bellary mines scandal = $3.2 billion (Upper caste)
  • Adarsh Housing Society (Upper caste)
  • Lavasa = $80 million (Upper caste)
  • APIIIC = $2 billion (Upper caste)
  • Vasundhara Raje land scandal = $4.4 billion (Upper caste)
  • Satyam = $1 billion (Upper caste)
  • Natwar Singh = $10 billion (Upper caste)
  • Advani Hawala = $18 million (Upper caste)


Why Manuwadis Fake Patriotism?

After BJP has come to power the fervor with which the word ‘patriotism’ is trumpeted will make  a sane person go insane. They say for them India comes FIRST and other things a distant second. Unsurprisingly, they justify their deeds and misdeeds by invoking patriotism. Even hard core criminal like Chotta Rajan resorted to patriotism in his defense. I will uncover why these vile creatures harp on patriotism all the time.

It is open secret that these casteist beasty people did not participate during India’s independence struggle. They openly colluded with British and did not take part in Quit India movement. After India own independence they started harping on patriotism. I don’t want to go to history but want to make my point in present political setting.

First and foremost, patriotism provides a cover to hide their atrocities on Dalit, Tribal and minorities. If you raise these issues they would say they are more worried about India than the petty issues like caste rape or killing. They conveniently ignore the fact that such incidents occur almost on daily basis. Patriotism suppresses the gross human right violations that go on in many parts of India unabated.

Secondly, the present govt is upper caste, especially Brahmin and Bania friendly. Their policies are geared for benefit of these privileged people and at the expense of majority. Snatching of tribal land in Jharakhand and Chattisgarh, increasing various taxes for commoners, demonetization  raising prices of essential commodities, diesel petrol hike etc. are the tricks to transfer the wealth of masses to privileged few. All these actions of govt being justified on nation interest and invoking patriotism.

Finally, patriotism is a solid excuse to polarize masses on religion basis. They label Muslims and Christians as anti-nationals while proclaim themselves  nationalist. They demand unequivocal support for what the Manuwadi BJP govt doing. Unfortunately, thy have succeeded in their strategy and able to polarize people on religion basis on most states. Even Dalits and tribals are brought into their lies and they rip political dividend.

Throughout history they succeed exploiting Dalit Bahujans through religious agenda and in current age they have turned to propaganda.

Why Manuwadis Harp on Patriotism?

The Manuwadi  in India has held Patriotism to be the highest of all values. It is being propagated as the highest form of all virtues and every Indian must have it. Just having patriotism is not office, every citizen has to openly display it.

The cunning manuwadi snakes have come out a hidden agenda to tighten their grip on masses and keep them further pauperized. The state, judiciary, police, media,  so-called upper caste people and some brainwashed lower caste idiots all are party to this well-crafted propaganda. Every senseless act and talk of Manuwadi politicians and religious fanatics are being justified by masking it with patriotism mask.

India (Bharat) is being portrayed as mother and every Indian should shout Bharat Mata ki Jai (Hail Mother India). The standard slogan ‘Jai Hind’ (Hail Hindustan) is not only replaced by Bharat Mata ki Jai but being mandatory for everyone to shout. Uttering the sentence , according to these Manuwadis, proves one’s patriotism. Their hidden targets are of course Muslims and Christians who are uncomfortable with equating a piece of land with mother and hailing an imaginary mother because of their religious belief. No other slogan except uttering this one supposedly proves one’s patriotism.

The recent ill-conceived demonetization scheme has snatched livelihood of millions. 100 plus people died and business has been severely affected due to lack of demand. The demonetization which is nothing but legal plunder of people’s money sought to be justified citing ‘national interest’.  Those who oppose are being shut down by drawing parallel with Army men guarding boarders day and night for national good.

‘When army men can stand on boarder for days to protect us, why can’t we stand before ATM for few hours for common good?’ is the standard reply these Manuwadi  provide who disapprove demonetization.

Recently, Dipak Mishar, a RSS affiliated Supeme Court Judge, has made singing of national anthem compulsory in all film theaters before movie screening. Such a move, according to this right wing judge, will inculcate feeling of patriotism and belongingness to nation. Interestingly the Supreme Court turned down to the plea to make national anthem mandatory before every court proceeding.

So, What is the real motive?

The motives are two-fold.

Emphasis on patriotism allows the Manuwadi to hide inhuman atrocities they have committed against indigenous people like Dalit and Tribal over centuries and which still go on unabated. While in liberal countries like USA and UK values like humanism, individual freedom, tolerance and respect for other ideas are given priority over patriotism in India patriotism supersedes all other values . Giving priority to ‘Humanism’ over other ideals will clearly expose these wicked Manuwadis. The issues faced by Dalits and Tribals are played down by diverting attention to so-called higher ideas like ‘common good’,  ‘national development’,  and ‘national interest’.

The patriotism that Manuwadis profess is nothing but disguised communalism and stems from their intense open hatred for  Muslim and Christian. The idea is to divide people in ‘US versus THEY’ line and reap political dividend. Unfortunately, the seems to have become successful and are being frequently used before election to polarize masses on religious and ethnic line.

The real patriotism of these cowards Manuwadis are well known and documented. During independence struggle they sided with British and did not participate in freedom movements.

India is such country patriotism is not last but first refuge of scoundrels, bigots, communalists and religious fanatics. Foul mouthed politicians, corrupt corporates, tax evading celebrities and even criminal gangsters justify their misdeeds by taking refuge under patriotism.

The Shocking Truth About Hinduism and Its Origin

The present shape of Hindu history, beliefs and ideas are result of propaganda that started after British took initiative to reform the savage practices and beliefs like sati (bride burning), untouchability that were prevalent in India.

The propaganda was started by societies like Arya Samaj, Brahmo Samaj etc. and led by Vivekanand in the West. Their task became easier after British coined the word “Hinduism” to describe multitude of beliefs and cults that people of India practiced. The propaganda became vicious after RSS and Hindu Mahasabha were founded in the first half of 19th century. They constructed so-called greatness of Sanatan Dharma through lies, deceits and fabrications. After India got independence  History of India was re-written by Brahmin academicians, which is totally false and not backed by facts.

Truth about its origin

Hinduism is not oldest religion as vicious propaganda by Hinduvta leaders and supporters trying to assert. In fact its origin goes back to early 18th century and thus originated far later than other religions like Christianity, Judaism and Islam.

Let’s discuss how this religion is originated.

After closely watching the filth in subcontinent, the Persian named the inhabitants as ‘Sindhu’. Basically Sindhu means a thief, thug, cunning, ugly or dark. The Persians were astounded by cunningness and tendencies of these people to cheat and con others. The book ‘Lughet-e-Kishwari’ clearly mention the words like kala, Ghulam, chor, raahzan,barda,sia faam and other degenerating words to describe these people. In Persian ‘Hind-e-falak’ means the black of the sky and Saturn.

The word Hindu was first coined by the Muslim scholar Al-Biruni, who was the first person to document about the people living across the Sindhu river in the 11th century C.E. It was the British who coined the word ‘Hinduism’ in early 18th century and thus giving unitary shape to varied ritualistic and pagan cults prevalent in India.

According to the New Encyclopedia Britannica 20:581, Hinduism was a name given in English language in the Nineteenth Century by the British to the multiplicity of the beliefs and faiths of the people of the Indus land. The British writers in 1830 gave the word ‘Hinduism’ to be used as the common name for all the beliefs of the people of India excluding the Muslims and converted Christians.

It is noteworhy that the word ‘Hindu’ is not found in any of the classical writings of India. Nor can it be found in the classical Indian languages, such as Sanskrit or Tamil. In fact, the word ‘Hinduism’ has absolutely no origins within India itself. Still, it persists, and traditions as diverse as Shaivism and Jainism, Shaktism and Vaishnavism, have been described as ‘Hinduism.’ This may work as a matter of convenience, but ultimately it is inaccurate

In ancient India you had either a yogi, a bhakta, a tantric, a sanyasi, a sankhya vadin, a vedantin, a lokayata, a rishi, a muni, a pandit, a pragna, a yogini, a devi, a swami, a Saivite, a Vaishnavite, a siddha or Buddha, but no Hindu

Spiritualism of Savages

Hinduism is a religion that openly encourages untouchability, preaches ignorance and superstitious beliefs and worst of all, perpetuate a chauvinistic culture. The Hindu religion is brutally savage to women. They are being raped and eve-teased all the time. Most marriages in India are arranged marriages. The marriage is a sham where women are exploited and made to sacrifice their feelings in order to fit into a male-dominated society’s fixations with “honour. It is a religion of apartheid and parasitism because the way they treat Dalits. Dalits are treated worse than animal and casteism is many times worse than Racism.

Hinduism – the so called Sanathana Dharma – is just old ritualistic beliefs of animal worship, incestuous intercourse and animal sacrifice. Animal and child sacrifice were integral part of Hinduism, though child sacrifice reduced to great extent after arrival of Brtish.

Representation  of Hinduism in the West

The view presented to West about humane quality is totally a sham.

After Independence , lot of Brahmins and so-called upper caste educated people started rewriting the degenerate history of People in Subcontinent. Hinduism basically adopted Many aspects from Buddhism, meditation, perseverance and other teachings of Buddha were copied and packaged as Hindu inventions for Western Audience.

The Reality of Hinduism

Hinduism and Hindu Scriptures in essence basically emphasize more of ritual Sacrifices and Killing of animals,Children, Women as a sacrifice to the Gods- Some Purana’s even portray Incestuous relationship between Gods,Gods molesting their mothers, Female Goddesses fornicating with their sons and Male Gods cursing their wires. Worse even Hindu gods are meat eaters; Vegetarianism was adopted by upper caste after they observed its significance from Buddhists.

Hindu sexual morality comes from Arabs, Monogamy is not part of Hindu cult, basically it was adopted from arabs. Hindu culs basically practiced open air sexual rituals ,incest, wife sharing, penis worship, Vagina Worship, and other sexual perversions are very much part of Hindu cults. Hindu Gods like Krishna had intercourse will millions of Women, he even use to molest women by stealing their clothes or by peeping into their Dressing room and observing them in toilets.

Gods fighting over Women, Gods killing each other, Cursing each other for Sexual relations. money, power Etc.–Most Hindu mythical stories symbolize Human greed, lust for power, sexual desires, hatred .Etc…

These texts are not worthy to be called as spiritual. There is nothing spiritual in those Books, other than preaching Extreme sense of “Solipsism” -Krishna Preaching Arjuna that “kartha (Doer) and Kriya(Work),Karma is him”- “Everything in this world is representation of Mahavishnu, The Evil, Good,lust, Desire- Everything is him- Only he exists and rest is a lie (“Jaganmaya”- “Universal Illusion”)”

Krishna Says to Arjuna that entire Universe is an illusion. only he exists, he is the truth ..and whatever he does or he preaches is truth.

This message is shows Extreme sense of solipsism in Hindu religion-

When Arjuna is in confusion about the morality. Krishna tells him to forget the morality as “Morality by definition is Vishnu(Krishna)”-

Which means there is no morality, it’s an illusion- Only morality is to worship yourselves as you are the Brahman.

“Worship your “Self”, do whatever you wish, Entire world exists because of you, Only you are real and rest is an illusion, world exists to service your whims”- this is the final Adhyaya(Chapter) of Bhagavat Gita.

Where krishna preaches supreme arrogance and solipsism to Arjuna when he asks about the morality .this is the prime reason why Hinduism and Hindus basically are incapable of Self reflection.This is the reason why for most Hindus every act is justified as long as it work in their favor.


Hinduism is a socio-political system of control. It is greatest religion fraud ever that still going on. Its very foundation is based on lies, deceits, hypocrisy which translates into endemic corruption prevalent in all walks of life.

PS: A major portion of the article taken from web.